Ford Negotiates US EV Deal with BYD and Xiaomi, Plans to Use European Plants

Ford’s rumored partnership with Chinese giants BYD and Xiaomi, coupled with industry reactions, Tesla’s battery breakthrough, Uber’s robo‑taxi expansion, and other automotive innovations, paints a picture of a rapidly evolving global auto landscape where legacy players, tech firms, and new entrants collide.

Auto News
February 4, 2026

Table of Contents

Ford’s European Pivot and the Rumored Chinese Partnership

Two days ago, the Financial Times reported that Ford was in talks with BYD and Xiaomi to produce electric vehicles in the United States. While the automaker has publicly denied the story, insiders suggest that the conversation is still active. What makes the chatter intriguing is the possibility that Ford could use at least one of its European assembly plants to manufacture the new models. In return, Ford would gain access to advanced driver‑assist technology from the Chinese partners.

Ford’s European sales have fallen dramatically, and the company has a surplus of production capacity. The Valencia plant in Spain, which currently builds the Escape for the North American market, is slated to produce 400,000 units a year. To break even, a plant must run at roughly 80 % capacity, or 320,000 units. With sales of the Escape under 100,000 units, the plant sits far below its break‑even point. A partnership with BYD or Xiaomi could help Ford raise utilization and keep the plant profitable, while also giving the company a foothold in the rapidly growing U.S. EV market.

Such a collaboration would also allow Ford to tap into the Chinese companies’ experience in battery manufacturing and supply‑chain management, potentially reducing costs and speeding up time‑to‑market for new electric models. The move could signal a broader shift in how legacy automakers are approaching global production and technology sharing.

For BYD and Xiaomi, partnering with Ford could provide a gateway to the lucrative U.S. market and access to Ford’s established distribution network. It would also allow the Chinese firms to leverage Ford’s manufacturing expertise and potentially share technology, creating a mutually beneficial relationship that could accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles across both continents.

Industry Pushback on Chinese Automakers in the U.S.

At this week’s National Auto Dealers Association (NADA) convention in Las Vegas, the association voiced strong opposition to allowing Chinese cars on U.S. roads. Mike Stanton warned that Chinese vehicles would be bad for the industry, bad for the country, and bad for consumers. He argued that the presence of Chinese brands would hurt domestic manufacturers and reduce consumer choice.

Steve Greenfield, a partner at automotive venture firm Automotive Ventures, offered a counterpoint. He predicted that Chinese automakers would soon enter the U.S. market, forming joint ventures with American companies to build cars in U.S. plants, employ U.S. workers, and sell through U.S. dealers using U.S. finance companies. The debate highlights the tension between protecting domestic industry and embracing global supply chains.

The discussion also touches on regulatory and safety standards, as well as the potential impact on employment and local economies. While some stakeholders see Chinese participation as a threat, others view it as an opportunity to increase competition and spur innovation.

Tesla’s Dry‑Electrode Battery Breakthrough

Elon Musk announced that Tesla and its supplier partners have achieved a major milestone in lithium‑battery production: the dry‑electrode process. Unlike traditional methods that use liquid solvents and require large drying ovens, the new technique applies cathode material in a powder form. The result is a 90 % reduction in factory space, a boost in output, and a significant cut in energy costs, potentially saving the company a billion dollars.

With the dry‑electrode technology now scalable, Tesla plans to roll it out across its vehicle lineup, including the Cybertruck and the forthcoming Cyber Cab. The new batteries could be pivotal in meeting Tesla’s goal of producing two million cyber cabs a year, a key component of its autonomous ride‑hailing strategy. The breakthrough also positions Tesla as a leader in battery innovation, potentially influencing suppliers and competitors alike.

Beyond the immediate cost savings, the dry‑electrode process could reduce the environmental footprint of battery manufacturing, aligning with broader industry efforts to make electric vehicles more sustainable.

The dry‑electrode process also simplifies the battery supply chain by reducing the number of manufacturing steps and the need for hazardous chemicals. This streamlining could lower the overall cost of battery production and make it easier for suppliers to meet the growing demand for high‑capacity cells, thereby supporting the broader EV ecosystem.

Uber Expands Its Robo‑Taxi Footprint

Uber has announced plans to broaden its worldwide robo‑taxi services, launching in Hong Kong, Madrid, Zurich, and Houston. The company aims to have the service available in more than ten markets by year‑end. Uber has already partnered with BYU, Wide, Whimo, and Lucid, and previously announced robo‑taxi deployments in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, London, and Munich.

Despite forecasting a weaker first‑quarter profit due to higher taxes and increased competition for affordable ride options, Uber remains committed to expanding its autonomous fleet. The company’s strategy reflects a broader industry shift toward self‑driving vehicles and the integration of advanced battery and AI technologies. By deploying robo‑taxis in diverse markets, Uber hopes to gather data, refine its algorithms, and demonstrate the viability of autonomous transportation on a global scale.

Regulatory hurdles remain a significant obstacle for autonomous ride‑hailing services. Local governments must approve testing and deployment of robo‑taxis, and safety standards vary widely across jurisdictions. Uber’s expansion strategy will need to navigate these complexities while ensuring that its autonomous fleet meets stringent safety and reliability requirements.

Uber’s expansion also underscores the growing partnership between ride‑hailing platforms and automotive suppliers, as the company seeks to secure reliable powertrains and software for its autonomous vehicles.

Renault’s Chinese‑Made EV Motors

Renault is building a new production line in France that will use Chinese‑made electric‑motor components from Shanghai E‑Drive. The line, expected to be ready by early 2027, will produce up to 120,000 motors a year, primarily for entry‑level models such as the new Twingo. The move follows Renault’s earlier partnership with French supplier Valo to develop EV motors without rare‑earth materials, a plan scrapped in November.

With Chinese car sales slowing and the government tightening price cuts, automakers are offering longer‑term loans and financing plans to keep costs down. Tesla was the first to introduce a seven‑year loan, prompting competitors to follow suit. In China, at least ten brands now offer eight‑year low‑interest financing, with Nissan’s Silfie model available with no down payment.

Renault’s use of Chinese components reflects a pragmatic approach to cost control, while also highlighting the interconnectedness of global supply chains in the EV sector.

Honda’s Neuromorphic AI Chip Collaboration

Honda has teamed up with Texas‑based startup Mythic to develop a system‑on‑chip for software‑defined vehicles. The partnership aims to improve computing performance and energy efficiency for AI features such as automated driving. The joint effort also includes developing a neuromorphic chip that mimics the human brain’s structure, creating energy‑efficient, fast, and adaptive AI systems for next‑generation intelligent technologies.

By integrating neuromorphic technology, Honda hopes to deliver smoother, more responsive autonomous driving experiences while keeping power consumption low. The collaboration also positions Honda at the forefront of AI hardware innovation, potentially giving it a competitive edge in the rapidly evolving autonomous vehicle market.

Jeep’s Controversial Super‑Bowl‑Style Ad

Jeep’s latest advertising campaign for the Cherokee Hybrid has sparked debate. The ad features a whimsical storyline involving a child’s beloved fish, a grizzly bear, and an eagle, all culminating in a Super‑Bowl‑style presentation. The global chief marketing officer, Olivier Francois, questioned whether the humor was cruel, noting that the campaign was designed to stand out from the typical “super‑cute” Super‑Bowl ads.

Despite the controversy, the Cherokee Hybrid boasts a combined 37 MPG and is priced at $37,000. Jeep’s marketing strategy reflects a broader trend of automotive brands using bold, sometimes provocative, advertising to capture consumer attention in a crowded marketplace. The campaign’s creative risk may pay off by generating buzz and differentiating the model from competitors.

Early metrics from the campaign show a spike in social media engagement and a noticeable uptick in search queries for the Cherokee Hybrid. While the ad’s unconventional humor may polarize audiences, the increased visibility could translate into higher showroom traffic and ultimately drive sales for the hybrid model.

Looking Ahead

The automotive landscape is in flux, with traditional manufacturers exploring partnerships with Chinese firms, battery innovators pushing the limits of technology, and ride‑hailing companies expanding autonomous fleets. Industry bodies remain divided over the role of foreign automakers in the U.S., while companies like Tesla, Uber, Renault, and Honda continue to innovate in battery, AI, and financing models. As these developments unfold, the industry’s ability to adapt will determine which players thrive in the coming years.

Share:
1